Pugh Matrix
Force-rank concepts against a baseline; flow the winner back.

What it's for
A weighted scoring grid — rows are criteria (each with an H/M/L weight and requirement-anchoring chips), columns are a Baseline datum plus one per option. Score cells are + / − / S / ? and a Totals row shows live net weighted scores. A robustness verdict and a formal Decision Record (Analysis of Alternatives) turn it into a defensible trade study.
When to use it
Any design decision between two or more alternatives — topology, component, or algorithm choice.
How it works
- Launch from a Block Diagram block’s Trade Study action, or open Pugh directly. → The matrix opens seeded with the block’s function and I/O plus generic criteria (cost, complexity, reliability, performance).
- Add columns (options) and rows (criteria); set each Weight and score each cell. → Weights are H/M/L (3/2/1); score cells are + / − / S (same) / ?; the Totals row recomputes live and edits autosave.
- Read the robustness verdict, then Set Recommended Option. → A badge reports “Robust winner”, “Sensitive — hinges on weighting”, or “Effectively tied” with the margin; Set Recommended Option marks the winner.
- Click “Apply to Block Diagram”. → It creates a Block Diagram follow-on that rewrites the source block to the winning design and stamps winnerAppliedAt (the button then goes inert).
- Finalize the Decision Record. → Record method, assumptions, data sources and rejected alternatives; “Finalize Decision” stamps who decided and when — the Analysis-of-Alternatives artifact reviewers ask for.
Mechanics
- Baseline datum + dynamic option columns · + / − / S / ? cells · live weighted Totals
- Decision-sensitivity robustness verdict
- Set Recommended Option → Apply-to-Block-Diagram winner flow-down
- Requirement-anchoring chips + drift detection (regenerate criteria from requirements)
- Formal Decision Record (Analysis of Alternatives)
- Import / export CSV (matrix shape) · PDF · stamped PDF · TXT · JSON